on social rating methods for businesses
Social rating for businesses covers a wide range of approaches, in terms of both
their purpose, and the methodologies applied, as well as the parties involved.
Three different approaches have been identified, looking into this subject and
assessing social and environmental performance in a comprehensive way:
rating
It represents a "social rating" approach for businesses, carried out by specialised
rating agencies or firms such as Vigeo in France, SAM in Switzerland or Eiris
in the UK, with some grouped together in international networks. This method,
with its creation driven by investors who are sensitive to ethical issues (religious
groups, etc.), only concerns listed companies because its aim is to rank these
companies for investors, portfolio managers etc. This ranking, which varies according
to the agency, is generally based on the following main criteria: HR policy, client
and supplier relations, shareholder relations, factoring in of society’s expectations,
integration of respect for the environment. Independent evaluations are based
primarily on questionnaires and interviews covering the company’s various managers
and a sample group of its stakeholder representatives. The "rated" companies are
therefore willing to take part (answering questionnaires, sending the documents
requested, etc.), but this was not, at the outset, an active approach by them.
In order to cross-reference the information obtained and standardize the methodologies
developed, several international rating firms are currently creating networks,
looking to create their own stock market index for responsible businesses in time.
reporting
This represents a voluntary approach by the companies themselves (including unlisted
companies) which, to ensure transparency and dialog with their stakeholders and/or
prepare themselves for answering rating agencies’ questionnaires, have decided
to report on the various impacts of their activities. The report is delivered
as an information document, review or report, as selected. Depending on its type,
it presents progress made with a clear responsibility approach.While there are
a growing number of initiatives aimed at formalizing this process, today there
are still not any genuine standards in this field and is not easy to compare existing
reports with one another (nature of the company and its activity, nature of the
information provided and subjects chosen, existence or not of external audits,
etc.).
developing standards and labels
To formalise their commitment and assess their performance on a certain number
of social indicators, businesses may opt for social and/or environmental certification.
With this approach, the company commits to set itself objectives (means for the
standards and results for the labels) and implement the procedures needed to achieve
them. The company is then audited each year by an independent organization, such
as PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG or Bureau Veritas. These standards and trends
are becoming increasingly commonplace today, and the trend is moving towards a
consolidation of the various existing standards (see ISO 20000, AA 1000), which
would certify, in the public’s eyes, the company’s overall social approach.